practice · all tools

Integrating resource consciousness into the team's work outputs

Depth · what it can open●●○○2 — reflective
Holding · facilitation1 — host
Trust · group readiness★★some
Disclosure · what is sharednone

The team's greatest environmental impact may not be its own consumption but the consequences of what it produces, recommends, or decides. Build habits of asking about resource and environmental implications of the team's work: When developing solutions or recommendations: What are the resource and environmental implications of this approach? Are… An ongoing team scaffold (decision practice), run ongoing, not as a one-off.

Practical

Time
5-90 min
Group
3–20 · small-group
Settings
in-person, online
Materials
None beyond ordinary meeting/work settings
Mechanisms
life-embedding, cognitive-reframing
Change scope
state → skill · recurring-practice (Ongoing)

Instructions

Where
idg.thomasjordan.se/idg-team-scaffolds-webapp.html — Thomas Jordan's IDG Resource Library, open
Availability
Open online — published at the link, free to read

Source link checked 29 Aug 2026 — unchanged since we recorded it on 28 Aug 2026

This directory describes and points home; the instructions stay with the people who made them.

Origin

Thomas Jordan & Claude [AI] (IDG for Teams handbook — team scaffold) — IDG practice (idg.thomasjordan.se)

In this directory via Thomas Jordan's IDG Resource Library

Team leader role (Jordan): Ask questions about environmental implications as a normal part of review and decision-making. Model integration of environmental considerations in your own analysis. Ensure environmental criteria are included in evaluation frameworks.

status: checked · added 2026-08-25